Chevron Left
Back to Getting Started With Application Development

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Getting Started With Application Development by Google Cloud

4.5
stars
2,141 ratings

About the Course

In this course, application developers learn how to design and develop cloud-native applications that seamlessly integrate managed services from Google Cloud. Through a combination of presentations, demos, and hands-on labs, participants learn how to apply best practices for application development and use the appropriate Google Cloud storage services for object storage, relational data, caching, and analytics. Completing one version of each lab is required. Each lab is available in Node.js. In most cases, the same labs are also provided in Python or Java. You may complete each lab in whichever language you prefer. This is the first course of the Developing Applications with Google Cloud series. After completing this course, enroll in the Securing and Integrating Components of your Application course....

Top reviews

V

Sep 1, 2020

It is an Amazing Course to learn and grow in life .

Thank you Coursera and Google Cloud & Team for giving me this opportunity to learn and make my self better in the filed of Technology .

DB

Jun 1, 2019

t was a good free course. I only realised the second time round the labs are ungraded. So I plan on doing them outside Coursera on Qwiklabs itself so I can earn credits for my lab work.

Filter by:

251 - 269 of 269 Reviews for Getting Started With Application Development

By UMANG R

•

May 23, 2020

you must have to tell that some labs are optional and java in quiklabs is completely broken althought teaching is good and quizzes are good too

By Vigneshram M

•

Apr 12, 2019

not as good as the core fundamental course, I would rather read documentations than paying 50$ to watch some one reading couple of slides.

By Sanketh S

•

Jul 23, 2019

Felt it was too high level. Need more hands-on labs with stepwise walkthrough covering the theory that was covered.

By Daniel B

•

Sep 17, 2018

It has a lot of redundancy with the first course 'Google Cloud Platform Fundamentals: Core Infrastructure'...

By Stephen H

•

Dec 9, 2017

The Quiklabs don't work (404 errors), which means none of the labs can be completed.

By Paradoxe

•

May 2, 2018

The courses are nothing more than copy/pasting from the online documentation...

By EIMANTAS P

•

Mar 29, 2020

The content is quite basic, I did not liked the labs at all.

By Mo A (

•

Dec 28, 2020

Some Low Quality Recordings, boring labs, bad quizzes.

By Przemek

•

Oct 5, 2019

The same information was repeating again and again.

By Benjamin R

•

Sep 7, 2020

labs didn't work half the time

By Harshal

•

Dec 12, 2019

Audios were low in videos.

By Maulik M

•

Jul 18, 2020

Did not like the delivery of the course. The material was not well structured.

The material did not have consistency of depth that it wanted to cover.

For Ex: Best practices were at a programming and deployment level, while most of the content was at a much higher level.

Need a review of the material

By Mohammad S

•

Dec 9, 2019

Though the structure, presentation and format of the course is excellent, I haven't learned any development in this course. The lab tests were handheld and step by step procedure. After Finishing this course I can not confidently initiate any development on Google Cloud.

By anuragKoka

•

May 31, 2022

These are all completed course . Coursera should have way to open these to the folks who have already completed this for revision. Why should I pay again for already completed course.

By Mevluet P

•

Feb 20, 2020

It is nothing to learn. It is just marketing material of google. I expected to see how you develop an application step by step.

By James O

•

May 15, 2021

Awful. Lots of information but poorly delivered and very little take aways. Don't feel I learnt anything of use from this.

By Oleg P

•

Nov 16, 2019

bad, hard to understand, hard to memorize video material quality! Labs requires only JS skills but does GCP require this?

By N V

•

Oct 22, 2018

Poor content delivery & structure, with unclear Lab instructions.

By Louis V

•

May 11, 2019

Outdated, not polished at all.